Lifecycle events
Created, sent, responded, blocked, rejected, expired, or approved — with timestamps and correlation context.
Evidence
Deterministic authorization evidence, not a thin success log.
Credentis turns every authorization event into a reconstructable record. That matters because post-incident explanation, dispute handling, and regulator review require more than a statement that a familiar artifact was returned.
Evidence highlights
Audit posture
01Evidence set
Transaction context
Reference, amount, beneficiary, channel, and timing inputs.
02Evidence set
Event record
Challenge ID, lifecycle timestamps, and binding references.
03Evidence set
Control results
Admission outcome, continuity result, timing checks, and policy outputs.
04Evidence set
Decision output
Final outcome, assurance state, and evidence references.
Evidence legitimacy
Why the evidence layer matters
If a framework changes the basis of approval confidence, it must also produce evidence that the institution can reconstruct, review, and defend.
Evidence posture
The authorization event should be explainable in operational language.
Credentis can preserve the state transitions and decisions that explain why a transaction was allowed, rejected, blocked, or failed. That makes the evidence layer usable for operations and governance, not just for runtime enforcement.
Investigation-ready event posture
No.
Investigation field
Why it matters
01
Investigation field
Session identifier
Why it matters
Lets investigators tie the approval event to the exact runtime instance under review.
02
Investigation field
Transaction reference
Why it matters
Keeps the authorization evidence anchored to the specific payment or transfer in question.
03
Investigation field
Menu mapping
Why it matters
Shows what the customer was actually shown at the point of decision.
04
Investigation field
User selection
Why it matters
Captures the response path taken inside the live authorization interaction.
05
Investigation field
Continuity result
Why it matters
Records whether subscriber continuity and surrounding checks held as expected.
06
Investigation field
Policy outcomes
Why it matters
Shows how rule evaluation and risk posture influenced the decision.
07
Investigation field
Lifecycle timestamps
Why it matters
Makes the event reconstructable across creation, delivery, response, expiry, and resolution.
08
Investigation field
Final authorization status
Why it matters
Preserves the operational result for disputes, governance, and post-incident explanation.
Evidence categories
Evidence that can be reconstructed when scrutiny arrives.
Audit teams need more than a result flag. These categories preserve how the approval event unfolded, what it evaluated, and what the bank can later verify.
Menu mapping
The specific menu presented to the user, including the mapping of options, can be preserved for reconstruction.
Subscriber continuity
Expected and observed subscriber state can be logged alongside the continuity result and any resulting hard lock.
Policy decisions
Velocity outcomes, policy evaluations, and final decision posture are preserved as part of the event trail.
Next step
Carry the evidence story into regulatory fit and formal institutional review.
Regulatory Compliance connects the operating proof to institutional defensibility. Institutional Inquiry opens the formal evaluation path.